Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xplora
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete both. Hut 8.5 19:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Xplora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG. Mattg82 (talk) 18:51, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because it is a non notable album by Xplora:
- Azul Electrónico (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both - Lacks WP:RS to satisfy WP:BAND or WP:GNG. Happy Editing! — 71.166.157.61 (talk · contribs) 20:31, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 15:51, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 04:29, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both. I agree that notability has not been established - no evidence of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Dawn Bard (talk) 14:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.